Prisma ODS Revista Científica Multidisciplinar
Volumen 3, Número 1 - Año 2024
Página | 1
Prisma ODS Revista Científica Multidisciplinar
Volumen 3, Número 1 - Año 2024
Página | 119
From the Field to the Consumer: The Role of Agrosciences in the
Optimization of Short Food Supply Chains
Del Campo al Consumidor: El Rol de las Agro-ciencias en la Optimización
de los Circuitos Cortos de Comercialización
Dustin Tahisin Gómez Rodríguez
dustin.gomez@uniasturias.edu.co
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5359-2300
Universitaria Agustiniana
Colombia
Carlos David Martínez Ramírez
carlos.martinezr@uniagustiniana.edu.co
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0313-0113
Universitaria Agustiniana
Colombia
José Manuel Barreto Hernández
jose.barreto@uniagustiniana.edu.co
https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7469-3895
Universitaria Agustiniana
Colombia
Artículo recibido: 10 de octubre del 2024
Aceptado para publicación: 12 de noviembre 2024
Conflictos de Intereses: Ninguno que declarar
Prisma ODS Revista Científica Multidisciplinar
Volumen 3, Número 1 - Año 2024
Página | 120
ABSTRACT
The general objective of this study is to analyze the synergies between agrosciences and short
food supply chains (SFSC), identifying the challenges that affect their sustainability and
efficiency within agri-food systems. To this end, a qualitative approach is employed, based
on a systematic literature review using the PRISMA method, ensuring a rigorous analysis of
relevant scientific sources. The results highlight three key areas in the interaction between
agrosciences and SFSC: (1) technological innovation and traceability, where tools such as
blockchain and precision agriculture enhance efficiency but face economic and technological
barriers; (2) agroecology and sustainability, which strengthen the resilience of the agri-food
system, although their implementation is hindered by a lack of incentives and differentiated
regulation; and (3) socio-economic organization and territorial governance, which are
fundamental for producer coordination and market stability. In conclusion, integrating
agrosciences into SFSC is crucial for the sector’s sustainability, but it requires investment in
infrastructure, inclusive public policies, and participatory governance strategies.
Keywords: agribusiness, agri-food supply chains; food traceability, agroecological
production, sustainable rural development
Prisma ODS Revista Científica Multidisciplinar
Volumen 3, Número 1 - Año 2024
Página | 121
RESUMEN
El objetivo general de este estudio es analizar las sinergias entre las agrociencias y los
circuitos cortos de comercialización (CCC), identificando los desafíos que afectan su
sostenibilidad y eficiencia en los sistemas agroalimentarios. Para ello, se emplea un enfoque
cualitativo basado en la revisión sistemática de literatura mediante el método PRISMA,
garantizando un análisis riguroso de fuentes científicas relevantes. Los resultados evidencian
tres áreas clave en la interacción entre agrociencias y CCC: (1) la innovación tecnológica y la
trazabilidad, donde herramientas como blockchain y agricultura de precisión optimizan la
eficiencia pero enfrentan barreras económicas y tecnológicas; (2) la agroecología y
sostenibilidad, que fortalecen la resiliencia del sistema agroalimentario, aunque su
implementación se ve limitada por la falta de incentivos y regulación diferenciada; y (3) la
organización socioeconómica y gobernanza territorial, fundamental para la articulación de los
productores y la estabilidad del mercado. En conclusión, la integración de las agrociencias en
los CCC es clave para la sostenibilidad del sector, pero requiere inversión en infraestructura,
políticas públicas inclusivas y estrategias de gobernanza participativa.
Palabras clave: agronegocios, cadenas de suministros agroalimentarios, trazabilidad
alimentaria, producción agroecológica, desarrollo rural sostenible
Prisma ODS Revista Científica Multidisciplinar
Volumen 3, Número 1 - Año 2024
Página | 122
INTRODUCTION
Agrosciences, as an interdisciplinary field, integrate knowledge from agronomy,
biotechnology, ecology, and agricultural economics to optimize production systems in terms
of sustainability and resilience (Reyes, 2016). In this context, short food supply chains
(SFSC) emerge as a key mechanism for strengthening synergies between producers and
consumers, minimizing intermediation, and promoting more equitable and sustainable agri-
food development models (Garzon et al., 2022; 2023).
From an agroecological perspective, SFSC facilitate the valorization of local production
through direct sales strategies, farmers' markets, cooperatives, and digital platforms,
generating positive externalities such as carbon footprint reduction, enhanced food security,
and increased added value at the source (Maluff, 2021). Furthermore, these circuits enhance
the construction of socio-economic networks that support territorial governance and stimulate
rural economies (Barbosa et al., 2021; Altieri et al., 2015).
Nevertheless, the consolidation of SFSC faces multiple structural and operational challenges
(Martínez et al., 2024). Among these, key obstacles include supply fragmentation, variability
in product quality, limited logistical infrastructure, and information asymmetries among
market actors. Additionally, the lack of robust public policies that provide financial and
technical incentives for small-scale producers constitutes a major barrier to the scalability of
these models (Gómez et al., 2024; De Souza Santos, 2011).
Within this framework, it is imperative to promote strategies that enhance the efficiency of
SFSC through the use of traceability technologies, participatory certification systems, and
cooperative management models (Medina & García, 2020). In this way, agrosciences can
play a crucial role in identifying innovative solutions that enable the integration of SFSC
within a sustainable agri-food production approach, resilient to socio-economic and
environmental changes (Correa et al., 2022; FAO & CEPAL, 2021).
Therefore, the general objective of this article is to analyze the synergies between
AgroSciences and short food supply chains, identifying the factors that influence their
sustainability and efficiency. The research question guiding this study is: How do
AgroSciences contribute to the optimization of short food supply chains, and what are the
main challenges that limit their implementation and scalability in sustainable agri-food
systems?
Prisma ODS Revista Científica Multidisciplinar
Volumen 3, Número 1 - Año 2024
Página | 123
METHODOLOGY
This research follows a qualitative approach based on a systematic literature review,
employing the PRISMA method (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and
Meta-Analyses) to ensure rigor in the identification, selection, and analysis of relevant
sources (Aguilera et al., 2020). The primary objective is to explore the synergies between
AgroSciences and short food supply chains (SFSC) by identifying connections and
challenges from the existing scientific literature.
Systematic Review Design
The PRISMA method was applied in four phases:
Identification: a comprehensive search was conducted in indexed academic databases such as
Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and Scielo (Barbosa et al., 2020).
Selection: duplicates were removed, and inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied.
Eligibility: abstracts and full texts were reviewed to ensure their relevance to the analytical
categories.
Inclusion: the most relevant studies were selected for qualitative analysis (Bensman &
Leydesdorff, 2009).
Search Strategy and Query Formulation
Search queries were structured based on two primary analytical categories (AgroSciences and
short food supply chains), as well as emerging categories identified from the literature:
technological innovation and traceability in SFSC, agroecology and sustainability in SFSC,
and socio-economic organization and territorial governance in SFSC (Camacho et al., 2023;
Castro et al., 2017).
The search equations employed were as follows:
Table 1 Example of Search Equation short food supply chains (SFSC) or Circuitos Cortos de
Comercialización
Database
Search Equation
WoS
Tema: (("short food supply chains (SFSC) OR Circuitos cortos de
comercialización"))
Índices=SCI-EXPANDED, SSCI, A&HCI, ESCI Período de tiempo=Todos
los años
Prisma ODS Revista Científica Multidisciplinar
Volumen 3, Número 1 - Año 2024
Página | 124
Tema: (("short food supply chains (SFSC) OR Circuitos cortos de
comercialización "))
Refinado por: Años de publicación: (2016 OR 2017 OR 2010 OR 2013 OR
2015 OR 2012 OR 2009 OR 2011 OR 2014 OR 2008 OR 2020 OR
2021 OR 2022 OR 2019 OR 2018 OR 2006 OR 2005 OR 2004 0R
2003 OR 2002 02 2001 0R 2000)
Índices=SCI-EXPANDED, SSCI, A&HCI, ESCI Período de tiempo=Todos
los años
Tema: ("short food supply chains (SFSC) OR Circuitos cortos de
comercialización) "
Índices=SCI-EXPANDED, ESCI, A&HCI, SSCI Período de tiempo=Todos
los años
Scopus
TITLE-ABS-KEY (“short food supply chains (SFSC) OR Circuitos cortos
de comercialización “)
TITLE-ABS-KEY ((“short food supply chains (SFSC) OR Circuitos cortos
de comercialización “))
TITLE-ABS-KEY ((“short food supply chains (SFSC) OR Circuitos cortos
de comercialización”)) AND (LIMIT-
TO (PUBYEAR, 2018) OR LIMIT- TO (PUBYEAR, 2017) OR
LIMIT-TO (PUBYEAR, 2019) OR LIMIT-
TO (PUBYEAR, 2020) OR LIMIT-TO (PUBYEAR, 2016) OR LIMIT-
TO (PUBYEAR, 2015) OR LIMIT-
TO (PUBYEAR, 2014) OR LIMIT- TO (PUBYEAR, 2022) OR
LIMIT-TO (PUBYEAR, 2023) OR LIMIT-
TO (PUBYEAR, 2013) OR LIMIT-
TO (PUBYEAR, 2012) OR LIMIT-
TO (PUBYEAR, 2011) OR LIMIT-
TO (PUBYEAR, 2010) OR LIMIT-
TO (PUBYEAR, 2009) OR LIMIT-TO (PUBYEAR, 2008) OR
LIMIT-TO (PUBYEAR, 2000) OR LIMIT-
Source: Own elaboration.
Prisma ODS Revista Científica Multidisciplinar
Volumen 3, Número 1 - Año 2024
Página | 125
Table 2 Example of Search Equation Agrociencias or Agrosciences
Database
Search Equation
WoS
Tema: (("Agrociencias or Agrosciences)"))
Índices=SCI-EXPANDED, SSCI, A&HCI, ESCI Período de tiempo=Todos
los años
Tema: (("Agrociencias or Agrosciences"))
Refinado por: Años de publicación: (2016 OR 2017 OR 2010 OR 2013 OR
2015 OR 2012 OR 2009 OR 2011 OR 2014 OR 2008 OR 2020 OR
2021 02 2022 OR 2019 OR 2018 OR 2006 OR 2005 OR 2004 0R 2003
OR 2002 02 2001 0R 2000)
Índices=SCI-EXPANDED, SSCI, A&HCI, ESCI Período de
tiempo=Todos los años
Tema: ("Agrociencias or Agrosciences ")
Índices=SCI-EXPANDED, ESCI, A&HCI, SSCI Período de tiempo=Todos
los años
Scopus
TITLE-ABS-KEY (“Agrociencias or Agrosciences)“)
TITLE-ABS-KEY ((“Agrociencias or Agrosciences) “))
TITLE-ABS-KEY ((“Agrociencias or Agrosciences”)) AND (LIMIT-
TO (PUBYEAR, 2018) OR LIMIT-TO (PUBYEAR, 2017) OR LIMIT-
TO (PUBYEAR, 2016) OR LIMIT-TO (PUBYEAR, 2015) OR LIMIT-
TO (PUBYEAR, 2014) OR LIMIT-TO (PUBYEAR, 2013) OR LIMIT-
TO (PUBYEAR, 2012) OR LIMIT-TO (PUBYEAR, 2011) OR LIMIT-
TO (PUBYEAR, 2010) OR LIMIT-TO (PUBYEAR, 2009) OR LIMIT-
TO (PUBYEAR, 2008) OR LIMIT-TO (PUBYEAR, 2000) OR LIMIT-
Source: Own elaboration.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria
Studies published between 2015 and 2024.
Full-text articles available in English and Spanish.
Research addressing the relationship between AgroSciences and SFSC from an academic
perspective (Devi Prasad, 2019; Carrizo, 2000).
Prisma ODS Revista Científica Multidisciplinar
Volumen 3, Número 1 - Año 2024
Página | 126
Qualitative studies, systematic reviews, and articles analyzing public policies in the agri-food
sector.
Exclusion criteria
Non-academic documents (news articles, blogs, private sector reports).
Studies not directly related to the analytical and emerging categories.
Publications in languages other than English or Spanish (Rincón & Gómez, 2023; Pliscoff-
Varas, 2017).
Data analysis and synthesis
The selected articles were organized in a data matrix, enabling the extraction of relevant
information for each analytical category. A qualitative analysis was then conducted using
thematic coding, which facilitated the identification of recurring patterns in the literature and
the formulation of conclusions regarding the relationship between AgroSciences and short
food supply chains (Rushforth, 2016; Van Eck & Waltman, 2009).As a result, 143 studies
were identified, consisting of 101 journal articles, 34 institutional documents, and 6 reviews
RESULTS
Technological innovation and traceability in SFSC
The integration of advanced technologies in short food supply chains (SFSC) represents a key
strategy for optimizing the efficiency of the agri-food system (Meyer, 2020). The
implementation of tools such as precision agriculture, artificial intelligence, and
biotechnology enhances production planning, reduces post-harvest losses, and ensures a more
stable supply of agricultural products in local markets (Moulaert & Ailenei, 2005).
Additionally, process automation through sensors and remote monitoring systems facilitates
data-driven decision-making, optimizing natural resource management and reducing the
environmental impact of production (Vergara, 2017; World Bank, 2006).
Digital traceability has become a fundamental pillar in strengthening consumer trust in SFSC
(Leewuis, 2004). Technologies such as blockchain, QR codes, and georeferenced information
platforms allow for verifiable data on food origin, production conditions, and distribution
processes (Mora, 2012). This enhances market transparency while enabling producers to
access differentiated markets that value food safety and sustainable practices. However, the
adoption of these tools remains limited in rural areas due to high costs, connectivity
deficiencies, and a lack of technological training among producers (Sánchez & Herrera, 2017;
Rodríguez et al., 2016).
Prisma ODS Revista Científica Multidisciplinar
Volumen 3, Número 1 - Año 2024
Página | 127
Although there are clear advantages, the digitalization of SFSC faces multiple structural
challenges (Rendón & Gómez, 2020). Limited financial access for technology acquisition,
resistance to change from traditional producers, and the need for adequate regulatory
frameworks are barriers hindering these advancements. Therefore, it is crucial to design
public policies that promote technology transfer and digital training in rural communities,
ensuring greater equity in access to innovation within SFSC (Gómez et al., 2023; FAO,
2018).
Agroecology and sustainability in SFSC
Short food supply chains provide an opportunity to promote sustainable agri-food systems
based on agroecological principles (Laverde et al., 2020). Strategies such as crop
diversification, integrated pest management, and organic fertilization strengthen the resilience
of agricultural ecosystems, reducing reliance on synthetic inputs and improving soil quality
(Rastoin, 2015). Likewise, these approaches contribute to minimizing the environmental
footprint of production, preserving biodiversity, and reducing greenhouse gas emissions
(FAO, 2010; 2009).
From a socioeconomic perspective, SFSC enhance producer autonomy by reducing reliance
on intermediaries and improving value distribution along the supply chain (Rodríguez et al.,
2018). This leads to higher farmer incomes and greater economic stability in rural
communities. However, the consolidation of these models faces challenges related to the
absence of governmental incentives, lack of differentiated regulations for agroecological
production, and the need to expand the market demand for sustainable products (Gómez &
Barbosa, 2024; Álvarez, 2017).
One of the main obstacles to expanding SFSC under an agroecological framework is the
limited storage and distribution infrastructure (Gómez, 2024b). The lack of collection centers,
cold chain facilities, and efficient transport can lead to product perishability, reducing the
competitiveness of small-scale producers. Consequently, greater investment in agri-food
infrastructure and public policies promoting product differentiation are necessary to facilitate
the integration of agroecological goods into urban and regional markets (Carvani et al., 2017;
Berdegué et al., 2012).
Socioeconomic organization and territorial governance in SFSC
The strengthening of SFSC is largely dependent on the organizational capacity of producers
and the implementation of territorial governance models that foster cooperation and
efficiency in commercialization (Gómez & Barbosa, 2024). Producer associations,
cooperatives, and farmers’ markets play a critical role in consolidating distribution networks
Prisma ODS Revista Científica Multidisciplinar
Volumen 3, Número 1 - Año 2024
Página | 128
that reduce transaction costs and enhance the competitiveness of local products. Furthermore,
these structures help generate economies of scale, optimizing access to inputs, financing, and
technical training (Arias, 2021; Dematteis & Governa, 2005).
However, supply fragmentation remains one of the key challenges in structuring SFSC
(Gómez et al., 2024). Variability in production levels, lack of quality standards, and weak
coordination among agri-food system actors hinder market stability. Additionally, informality
in commercialization and the absence of specific regulatory frameworks for SFSC limit their
expansion and recognition within rural development policies (Chacón, 2021; FAO, 2019).
To overcome these challenges, it is essential to promote participatory governance models that
integrate producers, consumers, and institutional stakeholders in the planning and
management of SFSC (Gómez & Aguirre, 2023). Strategies such as territorial agreements,
local food procurement programs, and participatory certifications can contribute to enhancing
market stability and strengthening the producer-consumer relationship. Consequently, SFSC
can be consolidated as a viable alternative to promote food sovereignty and socioeconomic
development in rural communities (Dávila et al., 2018; Escobar, 2011).
DISCUSSION
The synergies between AgroSciences and short food supply chains (SFSC) create a complex
scenario where sustainable development opportunities and structural challenges converge,
limiting their consolidation (Gómez & Barbosa et al., 2023). From a technical-scientific
perspective, agrosciences provide an innovation framework that optimizes production
processes, improves food quality, and ensures environmental sustainability. However, the
implementation of these advancements in SFSC requires adaptive strategies that consider the
socio-economic conditions of producers and market-specific demands (Rendón & Gómez,
2022; Gandulfo & Rofman, 2020).
One of the main convergence points between these concepts is the promotion of resilient and
efficient agri-food systems (Rodríguez et al., 2021). Agroecological practices, biotechnology,
and precision agriculture have the potential to boost productivity and reduce dependence on
external inputs, enhancing the economic viability of SFSC (Gómez et al., 2021). However,
limited access to advanced technologies and a lack of technical training among small-scale
producers remain significant barriers to adopting these innovative approaches. Thus, it is
essential to develop public policies that facilitate technology transfer and promote
agroecological education with a territorial focus (FAO, 2022; Rincón et al., 2004).
Prisma ODS Revista Científica Multidisciplinar
Volumen 3, Número 1 - Año 2024
Página | 129
Additionally, SFSC play a crucial role in improving value distribution within the agri-food
supply chain, reducing intermediation, and strengthening producer-consumer relationships
(Gómez et al., 2021). However, their consolidation faces logistical and organizational
challenges that limit scalability. Inadequate infrastructure, production variability, and market
informality hinder the competitiveness of SFSC when compared to conventional agri-
industrial distribution models (Chacón, 2020; Giraldo, 2018).
A critical aspect in this discussion is the role of governance and cooperation among agri-food
system actors (Gómez, 2024). The integration of producer networks, the creation of territorial
markets, and the strengthening of participatory certification mechanisms can enhance the
stability and reliability of SFSC. However, these efforts require greater coordination among
governmental institutions, producer organizations, and consumers, as well as the
implementation of economic incentives that promote local food production and distribution
(Deller et al., 2017; Kalmanovitz & López, 2006).
CONCLUSIONS
The synergy between agrosciences and short food supply chains (SFSC) offers a promising
path toward the construction of sustainable and equitable agri-food systems. However,
effective implementation depends on overcoming structural challenges related to technology
access, logistical infrastructure, and market organization. To address these issues, an
integrated approach is essential—one that combines scientific research, policy support, and
participatory governance strategies to maximize the benefits of these commercialization
models.
The adoption of advanced technologies such as precision agriculture, artificial intelligence,
and digital traceability systems (e.g., blockchain and QR codes) presents a key opportunity to
improve efficiency and transparency in SFSC. These tools enable better production planning,
post-harvest loss reduction, and increased consumer trust by providing verifiable information
on product origin and quality. However, significant barriers remain, including high
implementation costs, limited digital infrastructure in rural areas, and a lack of producer
training. To overcome these limitations, public policies must be designed to facilitate
technology transfer, provide financial support for small producers, and develop digital
education programs tailored to the realities of the agri-food sector.
SFSC are a fundamental strategy for transitioning to sustainable agri-food models, as they
promote agroecological practices such as crop diversification, integrated pest management,
and efficient resource use. These approaches not only contribute to reducing environmental
Prisma ODS Revista Científica Multidisciplinar
Volumen 3, Número 1 - Año 2024
Página | 130
impact but also enhance food security and strengthen the resilience of agricultural systems to
climate change. However, large-scale implementation faces obstacles, including the lack of
specific governmental incentives, the absence of differentiated regulations for agroecological
production, and limited consumer demand for sustainable products in conventional markets.
To strengthen SFSC sustainability, it is necessary to establish product differentiation policies,
improve storage and distribution infrastructure, and implement participatory certification
mechanisms that build consumer confidence in these production systems.
REFERENCIAS BIBLIOGRÁFICAS
Aguilera, M., Rincón, H., & Gómez, D. (2020). Bioeconomía, una alternativa de
investigación en administración y afines. En M. Aguilera, Rincón, y amp; H,
Temas y métodos de investigación en negocios, administración, mercadeo y
contaduría 193-225. Bogotá: Editorial Uniagustiniana.
Altieri, M., Nicholls, C., Henao, A., & Lana, M. (2015). Agroecology and the design of
climate change-resilient farming systems. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 35,
869–890. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-015-0285-2
Álvarez, J. (2017). Economía social y solidaria en el territorio: signifi-cantes y
construcción de políticas públicas. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, 1-82.Barbosa, E.,
Gómez, D., & Téllez, C. (2021). Logística e internaciona-lización de las empresas
antes y durante la pandemia del Covid-19. Breve revisión de literatura
especializada. Ciencia, Economía & Negocios.5: (1).71-96.
https://doi.org/10.22206/ceyn.2021.v5i1. pp71-96
Arias, M. (2021). La agroecología: Una alternativa a la crisis ambiental en Colombia.
Revista Internacional de Ciencias Sociales Interdisciplinares 10 (1): 49-64.
https://doi.org/10.18848/2474-6029/CGP/v10i01/49-64
Barbosa, E., Rojas, J., & Gómez, D. (2021). Prueba piloto del Plan Nacional de Fomento de
la Economía Solidaria y Cooperativa Rural - PLANFES. Estudio del caso del municipio
de San Antero, Córdoba, Colombia. Otra economía: revista latinoamericana de
economía social y solidaria. 14: (25), 77- 94.
https://revistaotraeconomia.org/index.php/otraeconomia/article/view/14924
Barbosa, E., Vargas, H., & Gómez, D. (2020). Breve estudio bibliométrico sobre economía
solidaria. Cooperativismo & Desarrollo, 28(118), 1-20.
https://revistas.ucc.edu.co/index.php/co/article/view/3723
Prisma ODS Revista Científica Multidisciplinar
Volumen 3, Número 1 - Año 2024
Página | 131
Benavides, D., (2017). Conexiones de la salud global. Ediciones Unisalle. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19052/9789585400696
Bensman, S., & Leydesdorff, L. (2009). Definition and identification of journals as
bibliographic and subject entities: Librarianship versus ISI Journal Citation Reports
methods and their effect on citation measures. Journal of the American Society for
Information Science and Technology. 60 (6), 1097–1117
Berdegué, J., et al. (2012). Desarrollo territorial rural en América Latina: determinantes y
opciones de política. En: Berdegué, J.A. y F. Modrego (eds.). De Yucatán a Chiloé:
dinámicas territoriales en América Latina. Buenos Aires, Editorial Teseo.
Camacho, M., Rojas, J., & Santillán, A. (2023). Análisis bibliométrico de la producción
científica sobre cooperativas agropecuarias en países hispanoparlantes. Cooperativismo
& Desarrollo, 31(126), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.16925/2382-4220.2023.02.01
Caravani, A., García, M., & Aznar, A. (2017). El desarrollo rural y la economía verde como
instrumentos de lucha contra el cambio climático: un análisis en la Comunidad
Valenciana (España). Economía Agraria y Recursos Naturales, 17(2), 179-209.
Carballido, D. (2013). Concepto de territorio: ¿arma de distracción masiva? Didáctica y
Prácticas docentes. Diplomado en Curriculum y Prácticas escolares en Contexto
(Flacso).
Carrizo, G. (2000). Hacia un concepto de bibliometría. Revista de Investigación
Iberoamericana en Ciencia de la Información y Documentación, 1(2), 1-10.
Castro, L., Rincón, M., & Gómez, D. (2017). Educación para la salud: una mirada desde la
antropología. Revista Ciencias de la Salud, 15(1), 145-163.
https://revistas.urosario.edu.co/index.php/revsalud/article/view/5387
Chacón, L., (2020). Competitividad e innovación. Ediciones Unisalle. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19052/9789585136748.
Chacón, L., (2021). Las agrociencias como soporte a una producción agropecuaria
sostenible. Ediciones Unisalle. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19052/9789585148963
Correa, G., Suárez, K.V., Obregón, N., De Armas Costa, R.J., Martín, P.F., Serna, Y.B.,
González, R., Rendón, J.A., y Gómez, D.T., 2022. Las agrociencias en la dimensión de
paisajes sostenibles. Ediciones Unisalle. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19052/9786287510326.
Dávila, R., Vargas, A., Blanco, L, Roa, E, Cáceres, L., & Vargas, L. (2018). Características
de la economía solidaria colombiana. Aproximaciones a las corrientes influyentes en
Prisma ODS Revista Científica Multidisciplinar
Volumen 3, Número 1 - Año 2024
Página | 132
Colombia, CIRIEC España. Revistad de Economía Pública, Social y Cooperativa, (93),
85-113.
De Souza Santos, B. (2011). Producir para vivir. Los caminos de la producción no
capitalista. México d. f., México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Deller, S.; Lamie, D. y Stickel, M. (2017). Local Foods Systems and Community Economic
Development. Community Development, 48(5), 612-638.
https://DOI:10.1080/15575330.2017.1373136
Dematteis, G., & Governa, F. (2005). Territorio y territorialidad en el desarrollo local. La
contribución del modelo slot. Boletín de la A.G. E. (39), 31-58.
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=1161234
Devi Prasad, B. (2019). Qualitative Content Analysis: Why is it Still a Path Less Taken?
Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 20(3), Art.36,
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/fqs20.3.3392
Escobar, A. (2011). Epistemologías de la naturaleza y colonialidad de la naturaleza.
Variedades de realismo y constructivismo Arturo Escobar. En L. Montenegro (Ed.).
Cultura y Naturaleza Aproximaciones a propósito del bicentenario de la independencia
de Colombia (pp. 49-75). Jardín Botánico de Bogotá, José Celestino Mutis.
FAO & CEPAL (2021). Sistemas alimentarios y COVID-19 en América Latina y el Caribe.
Como fortalecer los sistemas alimentarios urbanos. Boletín 19. Santiago. FAO y
CEPAL. https://www.cepal.org/es/publicaciones/45924-sistemas-alimentarios-covid-
19-america-latina-caribe-ndeg-12-comportamiento
FAO. (2018). Transformar la alimentación y la agricultura para alcanzar los ODS: 20
acciones interconectadas para guiar a los encargados de adoptar decisiones. Roma.
http://www.fao.org/3/i9900es/I9900ES.PDF
FAO. (2019). El estado mundial de la agricultura y la alimentación. Progresos en la lucha
contra la pérdida y el desperdicio de alimentos. Roma.
http://www.fao.org/3/ca6030es/ca6030es.pdf
FAO. (2022). El estado de la seguridad alimentaria y la nutrición en el mundo 2022.
https://www.fao.org/documents/card/es/c/cc3017es
Forero, J. (2009). Conformación productiva de los territorios rurales. Reflexiones a
propósito de la ponencia del profesor Tulet. En J. Ferro & F. Lozano (Eds.), Las
configuraciones de los territorios rurales en el siglo XXI. (pp. 231-240.) Bogotá,
Colombia; Editorial Javeriana.
Prisma ODS Revista Científica Multidisciplinar
Volumen 3, Número 1 - Año 2024
Página | 133
Forero, J. (2010). Economía campesina, pobreza, tierra y desplazamiento en Colombia. En
Forero Álvarez, J. (Ed.), El campesino colombiano, entre el protagonismo económico y
la indiferencia de la sociedad. (pp. 69-119). Bogotá, Colombia: Editorial Javeriana.
Gandulfo, A. y Rofman, A. (2020). Sistemas locales de producción y consumo de alimentos
saludables. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, Segunda época, 11(37),63-82.
Garzón, B., Barbosa, E., & Gómez, D. (2022). Política pública en la pandemia desde la
economía solidaria: circuitos cortos de comercialización-C.C.C. en Colombia (2020-
2021). Apuntes De Economía Y Sociedad, 3(1), 25–36.
https://doi.org/10.5377/aes.v3i1.14287
Garzón, B., Barbosa, E., & Gómez, D. (2023). Las organizaciones comunales como
gestoras de reactivación económica: mercados campesinos solidarios en el municipio el
Playón, Santander. CIRIEC Colombia. (1),245-257.
Giraldo, O. (2018). Ecología política de la agricultura. Agroecología y posdesarrollo. - San
Cristóbal de Las Casas, Chiapas, México: El Colegio de la Frontera Sur.
Gómez Rodríguez, D. T., & Barbosa Pérez, E. M. (2024). Diálogos entre la economía
solidaria y las nuevas ruralidades: estrategias para el desarrollo sostenible . Cultura
Científica, (21). https://doi.org/10.38017/1657463X.835
Gómez Rodríguez, D. T., Nieto Aguirre, M. A., Martínez Ramírez, C. D. (2024). Circuitos
cortos de comercialización, territorio y territorialidad: exploración de similitudes,
diferencias y fundamentos. Ciencia, Economía y Negocios, 8(1), 127-153.
Gómez Rodríguez, D., Barbosa Pérez, E., Martínez Ramírez, C., & Avellaneda Avellaneda,
Z. (2024). Economía solidaria y educación: Una alianza para el desarrollo
sostenible. Revista Estudios En Educación, 7(12), 184-204.
http://ojs.umc.cl/index.php/estudioseneducacion/article/view/366
Gómez Rodríguez, D.T. (2024b). Solidarity Economy and Public Health for Sustainable
Development and Community Well-Being. Cooperativismo & Desarrollo, 32(128), 1-
15. doi: https://doi.org/10.16925/2382-4220.2024.01.02
Gómez, D. (2024). La producción de alimentos para autoconsumo. Revista
Multidisciplinaria Voces De América Y El Caribe, 1(I), 52-79.
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10795207
Gómez, D., & Aguirre, M. (2023). Seguridad alimentaria y desarrollo rural en 5 municipios
del departamento del Caquetá, Colombia. Periodo 2018-2022. Población y
Desarrollo.29: (57), 75-93.
Prisma ODS Revista Científica Multidisciplinar
Volumen 3, Número 1 - Año 2024
Página | 134
http://scielo.iics.una.py/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2076-
054X2023005700075
Gómez, D., & Barbosa, E. (2023). Agroecología y circuitos cortos de comercialización:
Enfoques en diálogo con la naturaleza. Cooperativismo & Desarrollo, 31(125), 1–19.
https://doi.org/10.16925/2382-4220.2023.01.02
Gómez, D., Barbosa, E., & Laverde, M. (2021). Los circuitos cortos de comercialización y
la democracia directa en los territorios. Apuntes desde la economía solidaria. Inclusión
y Desarrollo, 9(1), 3-12.
https://revistas.uniminuto.edu/index.php/IYD/article/view/2918
Gómez, D., Barbosa, E., & Téllez, C. (2023). Política pública en Colombia: La innovación
social como estrategia de la Economía solidaria (2018-2022). En: INOVACIÓN
SOCIAL y PÚBLICA Experiencias y aproximaciones a la complejidad contemporánea.
Editorial Universidad de Chile. Santiago de Chile: Chile.
Gómez, D., Laverde, M. & Barbosa, E. (2021). Short Commercialization Circuits in Local
Supply Chains: Economic Revival in the Pandemic. South Asian Journal of Social
Studies and Economics, 12(2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.9734/sajsse/2021/v12i230299
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6294862
Kalmanovitz, S. & López, E. (2006). La agricultura colombiana en el siglo XX. Bogotá, D.
Colombia: Banco de la República
Laverde, M., Almanza, C., Gómez, D., & Serrano, C. (2020). El Capital Relacional como
Recurso Diferencial y Valioso para las Empresas. Revista Podium, (37), 57–70.
https://doi.org/10.31095/podium.2020.37.5
Leewuis, C. (2004). Communication for rural innovation. Rethinking agricultural extension.
Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science
Maluf, R. (2021). Decentralized Food Systems and Eating in Localities: A Multi-Scale
Approach. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural, 59(4), e238782.
https://doi.org/10.1590/1806- 9479.2021.238782
Martínez, C., Gómez, D., Barbosa, E. & Avellaneda, Z. (2024). Tendencias emergentes:
diálogos entre la sostenibilidad ambiental en la gestión de proyectos de innovación
social para un futuro sostenible. Ciencia y Sociedad, 49(2), 77-87.
https://revistas.intec.edu.do/index.php/ciso/article/view/3034/3679
Medina, N., & García, I. (2020). Formación de los circuitos económicos solidarios
interculturales en el cantón Cayambe. estudio de caso Biovida. Revista Economía.72:
(11) 63-79. https://doi.org/10.29166/economia.v72i116.2621
Prisma ODS Revista Científica Multidisciplinar
Volumen 3, Número 1 - Año 2024
Página | 135
Meyer, R. (2020). Los circuitos económicos solidarios como noción referencial. Revista
Economía. 72.(11),29-43. https://doi.org/10.29166/ economia.v72i116.2637
Mora, S. B. (2012). Las empresas del sector agropecuario: racionalidad económica y
gestión. AD-minister, (21), 87-
99. http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1692-
02792012000200006&lng=en&tlng=es
Moulaert, F., & Ailenei, O. (2005). Social economy, third sector, and solidarity relations: A
conceptual synthesis from history to present. Urban Studies, 42(11), 2037-2053.
Pliscoff-Varas, C. (2017). Implementando la nueva gestión pública: Problemas y desafíos a
la ética pública. El caso chileno. Convergencia Revista de Ciencias Sociales, (73), 141-
164. https://doi.org/10.29101/crcs.v0i73.4241
Rastoin, J. (2015). Les systèmes alimentaires territorialisés : considérations théoriques et
justifications empiriques. Économies et Sociétés, 8, 1155-1164. Revista Internos (22 de
mayo de 2020). La Secretaría de Agricultura Familiar cambió de nombre y avanza en
políticas para proteger al sector.
Rendón, J., & Gómez, D. (2020). Circuitos cortos y verdes. Alimentos si hay. Revista sur.:
https://www.sur.org.co/circuitos-cortos-y-verdes-alimentos-si-hay/
Rendón, J., & Gómez, D. (2022). Paisaje, territorio y agroindustria. El caso de la palma de
aceite en Aracataca Magdalena Colombia. En Cuadernos de Seminario: Las
Agrociencias en la dimensión de paisajes sostenibles. Número 13 Ediciones. Unisalle
Bogotá: Colombia.
Reyes, G. (2016). Agrociencias y empresas del agro: condiciones y perspectivas en América
Latina. En Cuadernos de seminario 4. Agrociencias en contexto. Compilador Ardila, A.
Doctorado en Agrociencias. Editorial Universidad de la Salle. Bogotá: Colombia.
Rincón, H., & Gómez, D. (2023). Cambio y aprendizaje organizacional, revisión
documental. Revista CIES.14: (2),27-49.
https://revista.escolme.edu.co/index.php/cies/article/view/464
Rincón, N., Segovia, E., Aguilera, G., López, A., Zavarce, E., y Leal, M. (2004). Los
pequeños productores y su participación en el proceso de comercialización
agrícola. Revista de la Facultad de Agronomía, 21(2), 172-185.
Rodríguez, D., Laverde, M., & Pérez, E. (2021). Short Commercialization Circuits in Local
Supply Chains: Economic Revival in the Pandemic. South Asian Journal of Social
Studies and Economics, 12:(2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10 .9734/sajsse/2021/v12i230299
Prisma ODS Revista Científica Multidisciplinar
Volumen 3, Número 1 - Año 2024
Página | 136
Rodríguez, H., Ramírez, C., & Restrepo, L. (2016). Nuevas tendencias de la extensión rural
para el desarrollo de capacidades de autogestión. Corpoica cienc. tecnol. agropecu,
17(1), 31-42.
Rodríguez, H., Ramírez, C., & Restrepo, L. (2018). Factores Determinantes de la
Sostenibilidad de las Agroempresas Asociativas Rurales. Revista de Economía e
Sociología Rural, 56(1), 107-122.
Rushforth, A. (2016). All or nothing? Debating the role of evaluative bibliometrics in the
research system. Research Evaluation, 25(2), 230-
231. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvw004
Sánchez. A., & Herrera, E. (2017). Desarrollo Rural Local: Un enfoque de desarrollo para el
reconocimiento de la diversidad rural y los actores locales. Tesis de Maestría.
Universidad de la Salle. Obtenido en:
http://repository.lasalle.edu.co/bitstream/handle/10185/21359/72121216_2017.pdf?seq
uence=1&isAllowed=y
Van Eck, N., & Waltman, L. (2009). How to normalize co-occurrence data? An analysis of
some well-known similarity measures. Journal of the American Society for Information
Science and Technology, 60, 1.635-1.651
Vergara, W. (2017). Tierra y territorio en las historias del conflicto. En Cuadernos de
seminario 7. Agrociencias y territorio. Editor Correa, G. Doctorado en Agrociencias
editorial: Universidad de la Salle. Bogotá: Colombia.
World Bank. (2006). Enhancing Agricultural Innovation: How to Go beyond the
Strengthening of Research Systems. World Bank: Washington, D.C.
